Some of the many things I have learnt from Steph in supporting students to do their best in writing and presenting, is to make a clear introduction, to tell a story, be interesting, and don’t ramble.
I’m sorry, Steph. I’m going to let you down.
I first remember Steph when she was an undergraduate student, and I was trying to demonstrate the use of an NMR spectrometer in a chemistry laboratory practical.
This practical centred around a particular chemical reaction – deuterating anthracene via the Grignard reaction.
As far as I remember, no one ever succeeded in getting this particular practical to work. Except Steph.
Her talent for chemistry was clear, undertaking a research project in the area and, after her pre-registration training year and registering as a pharmacist, came back to the School to interview to undertake a PhD in medicinal chemistry.
Fortunately for the world of biophysics, for me and many others, whilst touring the School, which of course she knew well, Steph was ushered into and shown the Laboratory of Biophysics and Surface Analysis.
And following the full-on hard sell, decided to undertake her PhD in the lab under the supervision of Clive, Martyn and Saul.
Steph’s research was truly remarkable.
She defined new areas of investigation, making a significant impact in fundamental science; worked with industry to enable them to understand and develop new treatments; and inspired many to follow in her tracks.
Steph’s research focussed on understanding how nature works.
She did this by developing the ability to handle and manipulate individual molecules, and see (and feel) how they behave and interact with each other.
To give some sense of the incredible nature of her work, if one were put one million of these molecules side-by-side in a line, that line would be only one millimetre long.
And Steph would handle and study these things using techniques and methods that she developed; using effectively microscopic needles, or beams of laser light.
And unlike me, Steph could explain and talk about her work in a way that was so clear.
As an accomplished educator, she used a variety of methods to convey her science, including a series of hand gestures forming a sort of biophysics sign-language for atomic force spectroscopy, scanning probe microscopy, and optical tweezers.
Many, many thousands of researchers across the globe have used Steph’s research to help theirs.
And they will continue to do so, citing her research papers that will live on in books and journals, on the shelves of libraries, and in on-line databases of publications.
And others will continue to progress the research that Steph has led.
Steph, however, wouldn’t like me to use words such as ‘led’. She always worked in collaboration with others; in the lab, in the School, across the Institution, across the world.
She was a cherished teammate for so many.
A month ago, Steph in one of these teams, heard she had been awarded over a million pounds to install the latest generation optical tweezer technology.
This state-of-the-art equipment will ensure her scientific legacy at Nottingham, and the continued training of the next generation biophysical scientists and PhDs.
Steph supervised over 60 students through their PhD studies.
There have been thousands of students who have benefitted from the teaching and educational leadership of Steph and who have graduated from the University and are now working across the globe, contributing to the healthcare and economy in their nations.
Steph’s outstanding contributions to the science, practice, and development of pharmacy and pharmaceutical science was recognized in 2018 by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society in their award of a Fellowship for distinction in the Profession of Pharmacy.
As a way to remember and celebrate Steph’s achievements, the School of Pharmacy at Nottingham is to create a prize, the Stephanie Allen-Patel Prize for an Outstanding Contribution to Pharmacy, which will be awarded each year to the person who most reflects the exceptional achievements, impact, and values of Steph.
Steph was always interested in what people were doing, what was concerning them, how she could help.
She knew I have an interest in cars, so when we talked, she would often ask about them, or what I was doing, or where I was going next.
She did this because she was interested in people, not because she was interested in cars.
She couldn’t have - at one point she had a bright yellow Fiat Cinquecento
(although she did later bomb around in a supercharged MINI Cooper S).
We indeed talked most days. Whether it was the discussion in the lab, at coffee or over lunch. Lockdown saw our regular Teams ‘chance for a coffee/tea/gin/whatever’ catch-ups.
Or it was the morning text-race to Wordle, or the evening debate about Strictly/The Voice/Eurovision/ or the Masked Singer (whatever that was! – that was Clive’s department).
My last email from Steph, only a few weeks ago, was to say that she understood how busy I was and that she wanted to know how she could help.
My last text from Steph was to ask about my recent trip to Dublin.
So, Steph answered many questions about nature and how things work.
How particular interactions between molecules ultimately causes myotonic dystrophy, how stem cells sense their physical environment, and how cells in our body may communicate with each other using a language of electricity.
There are a few things that she could not do:
Steph couldn’t do long division.
Nor could she convince me that Kimchi is, in fact, edible.
And Steph couldn’t answer the question of how someone so clever, so thoughtful, so considerate and kind, so beautiful and funny, could be taken away from us so soon.
Steph, you have improved the lives of countless, touched the hearts of many, and been a fabulous friend to me.
Thank you.
Comments